Microsoft Office 365 Open: Ready to Drive, Remaining Questions

Microsoft Office 365 Open and other business updates arrived today. Partners should celebrate but there's more room for Microsoft cloud progress. Here's why.

Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) has launched new Office 365 cloud services for business. The news, which was expected, shows real progress as Microsoft seeks to promote the Office 365 cloud platform to VARs, MSPs and cloud integrators. But the updates don't quite hit a home run for all channel partners. Here's why.

The new Office 365 includes Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, Lync Online and a range of additional services depending on which SKU partners or customers select.

Many partners are keeping an eye on Office 365 Open -- a program that allows partners to manage end-customer billing and pricing. That's a key requirement some partners have demanded ever since the original Office 365 launched in mid-2011. Rivals like Google Apps have long allowed partners to manage end-customer billing.

The Fine Print

To leverage the Office 365 Open capability, I believe partners need to focus on Office 365 Midsize Business edition. It's designed for 10 to 250 employees and it sounds feature-packed for partners. This service includes Office 365 ProPlus, Active Directory integration, a web-based administration console and business hours phone support. Pricing is $180 per user for an annual subscription (that an average of $15 per user per month). 

But did you notice that 250 user limit? Jump to Microsoft's enterprise Office 365 offerings for 251 or more users, and I don't believe the Open billing capabilities are available to partners. That's somewhat disappointing to me -- though I concede the vast majority of Office 365 partners focus on that 250-or-less market segment.

On the lower-end, Microsoft introduced Office 365 Small Business Premium. It's designed for small businesses with 1 to 10 employees. Pricing is $150 per user for an annual subscription (equal to $12.50 per user per month). But I believe it lacks the mid-market edition's Active Directory capabilities.

The Fine Print Part II

I believe Microsoft also requires a minimum one-year annual commitment to Office 365, though I need to double-check that. In the age of cloud computing a one-year commitment, if true, isn't good business. Cloud and SaaS companies must earn their customer retention every month, and be willing to let customers walk away at any time if they choose to do so. Prove your value and customers will stay -- with no need to throw in one-year commitments.

More Progress

I've got a lot more to say on this topic. Stay tuned for another blog today, including some great perspectives from Cindy Bates, VP of US small and medium sized businesses at Microsoft. I respect the progress Bates, Channel Chief Jon Roskill and other Office 365 leaders have delivered to partners in the past year. Roskill also shared some thoughts with me over email, which I will include in my next blog.

Assuming the new Office 365 updates work as advertised, today's launch represents serious progress for Microsoft and its partners. And a growing number of partners are embracing Office 365. But the journey isn't done.

Discuss this Article 6

Lee Evans (not verified)
on Feb 27, 2013

A 1 year commitment in itself is not that bad - plenty of successful SaaS companies have annual contract terms. Paying annually upfront however, as required by Open programs, flies in the face of the whole cloud model. That's not to mention that you have to buy in packs of 5 and you use 'em or loose 'em - contrary to the pay for what you use flexibility expected of cloud. All in all a rather missed opportunity for Microsoft which shows a lack of understanding of what their partners really want, or how the channel is evolving, again. That's not to mention that if you want to use the other plans you can't, and you lose the possibility to up or downgrade users through different plans based on your changing requirements.

Jason (not verified)
on Feb 28, 2013

I agree Lee. Paying upfront is not the ideal way to structure this for MSPs.

Joe Panettieri
on Mar 4, 2013

Lee, Jason: It's as if Microsoft is trying to open up to cloud computing while maintaining some of its classic on-premises software licensing tactics. The result is imperfect...
-jp

sean (not verified)
on Mar 4, 2013

I was really disappointed with the 'buy in packs of 5 upfront', if I have a customer who wants 4 and another who wants 7, I'm left with 4 on my hands to shift, the cost of which far exceeds the incentive.

Joe Panettieri
on Mar 7, 2013

I agree. Microsoft has made progress but should truly price this per user for the actual user count rather than charging in larger packs that may not be fully consumed.
-jp

Secure (not verified)
on Mar 8, 2013

We like the options we can give our Google Apps clients, plus the monthly billing options we have, instead of an annual pay. This allows us to build our business and keep cash flow manageable.

Google is going to keep building a strong partner channel, they can't afford not to. Just in terms of support, partners are much more adaptive in handling their clients needs. We'll support our clients all day long, just keep the services running and creating new features and added value for the client base.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Talkin' Cloud ID
(optional)
Featured Video

VMware Preps Partners for Federated Clouds
VP Frank Rauch offers the latest background on vCloud Suite and software-defined datacenters.

More Videos

Guest Bloggers